I think that it's more like half as much of each type, for a comparable total damage ignoring bonuses/penalties. Second, you're assuming that a two-damage-type weapon does as much damage of each type as a pure weapon would do. And better rules of thumb would be 120%-125% damage for vulnerable monsters and 20%-25% for resistant monsters. The most precise study I've seen is here. We don't like a lot of redundant threads around, but this thread is ancient, so it would have been better for you just to start a new thread.įirst, those bonuses/penalties are not at all precise they are just rules of thumb. but that takes a lot of practice, (since usually they will take the first bullet and then teleport, although its great in t2) the magnus line might be better for them, and wolvers might be the only type of enemy worth hitting with a sword. The bullets travel fast enough to hit them before they dodge, and the small bullets allow you to pick healers out of groups. The Blackhawk line on the other hand while very often ridiculed, is IMO the best gun for killing gremlins, laying down a continuous stream of fire allows you to constantly force the entire group to dodge, effectively giving it strong knockback, controlling groups really well. As a pure gunslinger its not that great, since you're better off shotting fiends with a magnus line gun, and there are plenty of strong elemental guns to cover undead. so they can fit both of those specialties into a single gun. The silversix line is very commonly used as the single gun brought into FSC by sword users since it is strong against undead and fiends, the majority of FSC.

And the Antigua lines are pretty decent at shooting those dodgers since they have such fast bullets. No idea why people keep making the argument that 'all the enemies its good against dodge' You have to shoot them with something :P unless you're one of those suicidal sword knights.

Spiral knights antigua